You are only seeing posts authors requested be public.
Register and Login to participate in discussions with colleagues.
Medical Journal News
Working at Cross-PURPOSEs to Ending HIV
A “Hot” Cardiomyopathy
Neonatal Lupus
A Phase 3 Trial of Upadacitinib for Giant-Cell Arteritis
Pierre Christian Ip-Yam
Myanmar junta blocking aid as earthquake death toll nears 3000
Correction: Potential public health impacts of gonorrhea vaccination programmes under declining incidences: A modeling study
by Lin Geng, Lilith K. Whittles, Borame L. Dickens, Martin T. W. Chio, Yihao Chen, Rayner Kay Jin Tan, Azra Ghani, Jue Tao Lim
How Trump’s trade war will break global medicine supply chains
Trump 2.0 sends “a ripple of fear” through the reproductive health community fighting for safe abortions worldwide
WHO to cut budget by a fifth following Trump withdrawal
HIV in primary care: further considerations
Helen Salisbury: Improved access is meaningless without increased capacity
Effective public health requires “deep prevention”
Stephen Andrew Cairns
John Christopher Howard
[Editorial] Rethinking coronary artery disease: a call to action
[Comment] From coronary artery disease to atherosclerotic coronary artery disease: what is in a name?
[The Lancet Commissions] The Lancet Commission on rethinking coronary artery disease: moving from ischaemia to atheroma
Efficacy and safety of passive immunotherapies targeting amyloid beta in Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
by Reina Tonegawa-Kuji, Yuan Hou, Bo Hu, Noah Lorincz-Comi, Andrew A. Pieper, Babak Tousi, James B. Leverenz, Feixiong Cheng
BackgroundWhile recently U.S. FDA-approved anti-amyloid beta (anti-Aβ) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) offer new treatment approaches for patients suffering from Alzheimer’s disease (AD), these medications also carry potential safety concerns and uncertainty about their efficacy for improving cognitive function. This study presents an updated meta-analysis of cognitive outcomes and side effects of anti-Aβ mAbs from phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients with sporadic AD.
Methods and FindingsPhase III randomized, placebo-controlled blinded trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-Aβ mAbs in patients with AD were identified through a search in clinicaltrials.gov, PubMed and Embase on January 14th, 2024. The retrieved studies were further screened from January 15th, 2024, to February 14th, 2024. We included studies that had been published in any language. Quality of trials was assessed using the Jadad score and publication bias was assessed using Egger’s test and Funnel plot. Primary outcomes were mean changes from baseline to post-treatment in Clinical Dementia Rating scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) and AD Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores, and secondary outcomes were adverse events, including amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with edema (ARIA-E), and ARIA with hemorrhage (ARIA-H). Random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression analyses were conducted. The literature search identified 13 phase III RCTs, which included 18,826 patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia due to AD. Compared with placebo, treatment with mAbs significantly improved cognitive performance on CDR-SB (mean difference −0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] [−0.38, −0.11]) and ADAS-Cog (standardized mean difference −0.09, 95% CI [−0.12, −0.06]), in which a negative change indicates improvement for both scores. Meta-regression analysis suggested that trials enrolling patients with early-stage AD were associated with better efficacy. Elevated risk of ARIA-E (risk ratio [RR] 9.79, 95% CI [5.32,18.01]), ARIA-H (RR 1.94, 95% CI [1.47,2.57]), and headaches (RR 1.21, 95% CI [1.10,1.32]) were noted. Statistical heterogeneity was relatively high for ARIA-E and ARIA-H, leading to wide confidence intervals and considerable variability in effect sizes, though meta-regression was conducted to address this. Furthermore, differences in trial designs introduce limitations in cross-trial comparisons.
ConclusionsAnti-Aβ mAb therapy slows cognitive decline, but with small effect sizes, and raises potential concerns about ARIA and headaches.