You are only seeing posts authors requested be public.
Register and Login to participate in discussions with colleagues.
Canadian News
R.D.P. triple murder trial: One of the accused takes the witness stand
Quebec's UPAC warns public of 'bank rep scam'
Lockout begins at B.C. ports in labour dispute
Sarnia, Ont., puts faces to names — and names to houses — in fallen war heroes sign project
One of the project’s organizers says homes still stand at 172 of the addresses — and 120 of them are the original buildings. The other 80 or so soldiers are pegged to homes that no longer exist and are being marked in a park near the St. Clair River.
3 charged in Brampton Hindu temple demonstration as India’s Modi weighs in
Quebec College of Physicians wants expanded private medical care halted
AB Premier’s 91.5% party approval rate shows there’s almost only extremists in UCP
No one should be shocked by the fact Alberta Premier Danielle Smith not only survived her leadership review vote but posted an absurd sounding 91.5 per cent approval rating.
The explanation is simple and obvious on its face, and not necessarily good news for the United Conservative Party (UCP).
To wit: There’s almost no one left in the UCP except the extremists.
The “lunatics,” as former premier Jason Kenney called them not long before they skidded him, now utterly dominate the party.
And of course they’re happy with Smith’s performance – for the most part, she’s delivering precisely the policies they demand. And when she doesn’t, a tip of her tinfoil cap to the chemtrails above or a boot aimed at a lonely transgender athlete below is sufficient to distract them.
So when Smith told her jubilant supporters – essentially everyone in the hall in Red Deer last night – that “our party is more united than it has ever been,” she spoke the unvarnished truth.
But agreeing with the first part of her statement – “our conservative movement is stronger than it’s ever been” – requires a little more nuance.
You could make a case it’s true if you go by the obvious unity of what’s left of Alberta’s big-tent Conservative movement of yore. But a large percentage of the old-style Progressive Conservatives and not-so-progressive but still sane Conservatives have abandoned the ship.
How they will vote in the next general election remains an open question, but the MAGAfication project that really got under way when Kenney was booted to make way for Smith is now for all intents and purposes complete. And it does not guarantee the UCP a victory in an election as the UPC would like you to believe.
Albertans were not well served by local media in the lead-up to this relatively meaningless vote, thanks to the addiction of lazy journalists to portraying any event in which a ballot is cast as a horserace. Where was the other horse in this race?
A leadership review is like a North Korean election. The leader is essentially running without opposition – although with the theoretical ability of eligible electors to vote no.
Thankfully, there’s still a little more freedom in the Democratic People’s Republic of Alberta than the DPRK, so Smith had to be satisfied with a mere 91.5 per cent. She still has a little way to go to catch up to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un, who the last time he faced a similar ballot seems to have captured 100 per cent of the vote.
Well, it’s a benchmark Smith can strive for next time.
Meanwhile, for Smith’s fan club at Postmedia to suggest that a 91.5 per cent victory in a race against no one is somehow the equivalent of NDP Leader Naheed Nenshi’s 86 per cent victory against several credible candidates, each with a base of support in the Opposition party, is preposterous and a little sad.
Likewise, when former Progressive Conservative deputy premier Thomas Lukaszuk noted last night that at the peak of their popularity, neither Peter Lougheed nor Ralph Klein received 95% approval, we need to remember that the PC Party in the heydays of those two premiers was a true brokerage with a moderate ideology and broad appeal. Of course the leaders of such a party couldn’t marshal that kind of support.
“All leaders with totalitarian tendencies get +90% support scores. Yet on the outside crowds of millions gather to oppose them. It’s funny how that works,” tweeted Lukaszuk, who grew up in Poland when it was part of the Soviet bloc. “It reminds me of my childhood.”
The UCP is not the next iteration of the Progressive Conservative Party. It is a lineal descendent of the Wildrose Party, and a successor to the Social Credit League – which under William Aberhart arguably formed an even crazier government, at least so far.
I imagine in 1935 or ’36, though, that Bible Bill could have summoned up a 90-per-cent-plus leadership review vote too.
By 1937, though, not so much. That year the voters in Premier Aberhart’s Okotoks-High River riding tried to recall him. His government repealed the Recall Act poste haste. Expect history to repeat itself if anyone looks as if they could have a chance of using Jason Kenney’s legislation of the same name to unseat a UCP leader. But I digress.
The Red Deer AGM passed all 35 of the policy resolutions put on the agenda for debate, including recognizing “the importance of CO2 to life and Alberta’s prosperity” by abandoning all net-zero targets and stating “CO2 is a foundational nutrient for all life on Earth.”
You can’t make this stuff up. The UCP has gone deep into climate change denialism and it’s likely to go deeper.
Readers may have seen suggestions in media that now Smith’s leadership review is successfully concluded, she will start to act more seriously.
Don’t believe it. The extremists are going to continue to call the tune and, insomuch as she might disagree with them, Smith can be expected to continue to dance to it.
The post AB Premier’s 91.5% party approval rate shows there’s almost only extremists in UCP appeared first on rabble.ca.
Murray Sinclair dead at 73 after trailblazing life as Indigenous leader
Danielle Smith introduces harsh anti-trans legislation
Can Danielle Smith be trusted about anything she says?
Now that Alberta’s premier has introduced what is widely acknowledged to be the harshest anti-transgender legislation in Canada, rivalling that in some of the more benighted corners of the Republic to our south, we all need to pause and reflect on that question.
A CBC commentator called the suite of bills introduced by the United Conservative Party (UCP) “Canada’s most restrictive and wide-ranging set of policies governing the rights and aspirations” of transgender young people. The three bills, wrote Jason Markusoff, “put Smith on the hard edge of Canadian reforms.”
Senator Kristopher Wells, recently appointed to Canada’s Upper House for his advocacy for sexual minority rights, described the legislation as “the most discriminatory and anti-2SLGBTQ+ legislation in Canadian history.”
When passed by the UCP majority in the House, Bill 26, the Health Statutes Amendment Act, 2024, will prohibit physicians from treating young people under 16 seeking transgender treatment with puberty blockers and hormone therapies.
Bill 27, the Education Amendment Act, will force students under 16 to get their parents’ permission if they want to change their names or pronouns at school. Bill 29, tendentiously named the Fairness and Safety in Sport Act, will ban transgender athletes from competing in leagues not designated as co-ed, among other things.
When Bill 26 is passed by the United Conservative Party majority in the Legislature, it will interfere directly with medical decisions for strictly political reasons – principally the premier’s need to pacify her party’s radical MAGA base at leadership review vote taking place today in Red Deer.
So even if your medical concern is something more commonplace – say, getting your seasonal COVID-19 vaccination or reproductive health care, both of which like gender-affirming treatment have because obsessions of the American MAGA movement that now drives the UCP – you have to wonder what will become the next medical target for the social conservative busybodies of the premier’s caucus.
“This legislation will dictate what health care services Albertans can and cannot access,” said Friends of Medicare Director Chris Gallaway. “It is an appalling abuse of government power. Health care decisions are between patients and their doctors. The premier reaching in to set health policy like this sets a dangerous new precedent which should be of deep concern to all Albertans.”
Not so long ago, Smith stoutly defended the rights of citizens that she now wants to brush aside.
A decade ago, a Calgary Sun political columnist described Smith, then the Wildrose Party leader, choking up about the need for gay-straight alliances.
“Wildrose leader Danielle Smith stands in the Legislature Tuesday and talks about meeting kids at gay-straight alliances,” Rick Bell trowelled it on. “It doesn’t take long for her to choke up as she speaks.”
But, hey, it’s been 10 years!
Just last year, though, in a statement on Pride Month during the 2023 election campaign, Smith was still insisting “everyone deserves to feel safe, welcome and respected in our province.”
“That’s why we will continue to listen to 2SLGBTQIA+ Albertans’ concerns and find ways to strengthen our relationships through dialogue and tangible action,” Calgary Herald political columnist Don Braid quoted her saying in a column headlined, “Why Danielle Smith will lean away from past flakiness, toward sensible government.”
It would appear Braid has come to regret that assertion. Well, good for him for admitting it.
Soon after last year’s election, Smith even trotted out a sympathetic story about a non-binary relative, real or imagined.
“I have a non-binary family member, and I believe these decisions are very personal, and it should not be debated in public,” she said. “We shouldn’t be making any child feel like the issues they’re struggling with are something that’s a political football.” (Emphasis added.)
Well, that was then, and this is a whole year later. Gender identity issues are personal? Forget about it! Now they’re among the biggest political footballs in Alberta history – and this is a province that’s had a quarterback and a punt returner as premiers! Now Premier Smith is doing the punting.
Aggressively defending her policy at a press conference on Halloween, the premier barked to a journalist that “we’re going to be making sure that our medical professionals know that this is a treatment that’s available for adults only.”
“Look, doctors were given a lot of latitude to prescribe opioids and now we have a fentanyl crisis as a result of inappropriate prescribing,” she told another reporter by way of explanation, defaming physicians in passing. “And we have had to put guardrails around who can prescribe opioids, how they can be delivered. And I would say doctors aren’t always right.”
She continued, claiming that puberty blockers and hormone therapies will have life-long consequences: “This has supreme consequences on young people,” she insisted. “… If you’re medicalized for life, it has consequences. If you are medicalized too early, it has consequences on fertility. And we believe that sometimes you have to step in and make sure you’re preserving choice and protecting the rights of kids so they can make those decisions as adults.”
This is sophistry, needless to say. “She doesn’t have the medical expertise to be able to make that decision about whether gender-affirming care is appropriate,” an Edmonton pediatrician and University of Alberta professor told The Canadian Press. “Secondly, calling some of these things irreversible or harmful is simply false,” added Dr. Tehseen Ladha.
Readers can decide whom they believe on this hitherto esoteric topic.
But there’s no argument to be made that Smith can be trusted to stand by anything she says.
Not every conservative politician would fail to do the right thing regardless of the consequences, but Smith has shown us clearly what she does when political expediency demands.
Don’t expect her to change after today’s vote in Red Deer.
The post Danielle Smith introduces harsh anti-trans legislation appeared first on rabble.ca.